Being socially conscious automatically burdens the thinker with a responsibility to recognize and respond to the identifiable problems of the world. I have believed for some time now that authenticity was an irrelevant and mystifying concept used, in effect, to keep cultural forms of hierarchical social stratification intact (artist vs. connisseur, writer vs. toy, professional vs. amateur, etc). I have failed to investigate the question of a person's response to the pressure of recognized moral duties. Doesn't this constitute some form of authenticity as well, at least in part to one's own consciousness?

the concept of relevancy is something constantly springs into my mind and iforms my conversations. the subject is brought up usually in the context of a cultural commodity. in essence it could be construed as being equivalent to "hipness" or "trendiness." i can`t help but feel that theorizing in this form is a pretentious act, buti insist on letting my thoughts flow uncensored so as to convey to myself the weight and depth of my thoughts....

(6/6) Other and hopefully as I expound on these ideas more my line of reasoning will become clearer.

(4/6) basic level all of our actions are proscribed by our need to increase our evolutionary fitness and by a survival instinct. Empathy is nature's way of

(5/6) uniting us and embossing our similarities. It may be a leap of faith I am taking in asserting an imperative of universal, infinite responsibility for the

(3/6) empathic universe one being's siuation is shared with every other. Now, why do I say that we are forced to accept this imperative? I believe that on a

(2/6) imperative. At once and in a sweeping motion we are forced to acknowledge our responsibility to alleviate the suffering of others, because in a perfect

(1/6) When we begin taking into account the subjective aspect of suffering and our ability to empathize with others we stumble on the realization of a moral

Is this a new post?